Comments on: Fluid Rails search http://christopherowen.id.au/blog/2009/05/05/fluid-rails-search/ Stuff cubed plus one Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:47:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Christopher Owen http://christopherowen.id.au/blog/2009/05/05/fluid-rails-search/comment-page-1/#comment-7176 Christopher Owen Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:17:44 +0000 http://christopherowen.id.au/blog/?p=86#comment-7176 I've been using it for all my Ruby development, but I'm not actively using Ruby at the moment. I'd still be using it for development in Ruby though as having such material conveniently accessible is a must. When I start needing it again, I'd love to write some Apple Script to have searching in Fluid directly from Vim. I believe the quick search doesn't work as well in Prism, but I don't remember too much about it. At the time, Prism in general wasn't of the same quality as Fluid. I’ve been using it for all my Ruby development, but I’m not actively using Ruby at the moment. I’d still be using it for development in Ruby though as having such material conveniently accessible is a must. When I start needing it again, I’d love to write some Apple Script to have searching in Fluid directly from Vim.

I believe the quick search doesn’t work as well in Prism, but I don’t remember too much about it. At the time, Prism in general wasn’t of the same quality as Fluid.

]]> By: David Hergert http://christopherowen.id.au/blog/2009/05/05/fluid-rails-search/comment-page-1/#comment-7175 David Hergert Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:21:50 +0000 http://christopherowen.id.au/blog/?p=86#comment-7175 I am going to give Fluid a try. In the 4 months since you posted this, are you still using Fluid? I'd be interested in such functionality, outside of my mac. Does Prism lack the "sexy quick search" because I would think that would be a big deficiency. I am going to give Fluid a try. In the 4 months since you posted this, are you still using Fluid?

I’d be interested in such functionality, outside of my mac. Does Prism lack the “sexy quick search” because I would think that would be a big deficiency.

]]>